You don’t need different press attacks for different presses. One comprehensive strategy based on simple, time-tested principles does the trick.
Defeating full-court pressure begins with understanding the nature of pressing defenses, then adopting an aggressive attack strategy that will seize the initiative from the defense. In this series of five blogs, I’ll outline a comprehensive approach to defeat full-court pressure. Here are the first three lessons.
Lesson 1: It’s an insult to be pressed.
When confronting full-court pressure, far too many teams seem content to cross the ten-second line instead of attacking the basket. Maybe it’s a lack of confidence or a perceived shortage of ball handlers. Whatever the reason, you don’t get points by merely crossing half-court.
Generally, this kind of approach invites greater pressure and indecision, culminating in one or more catastrophic breakdowns as the game proceeds.
Beating full-court pressure starts with believing it’s an insult to be pressed, and consequently, a willingness to accept pressure in the backcourt so that you gain an advantage in the frontcourt. Your goal is to punish the press by scoring points against it.
Lesson 2: All presses are the same.
You don’t need different press attacks for different presses. Once the ball is inbounded, all presses are the same.
Before the throw-in they may look different—man-to-man, various zone traps, even presses that combine man and zone principles—but in reality, they’re all the same. Or more accurately, they can be attacked in such a way as to render them the same.
The key is learning the underlying attack principles by practicing live, five-on-five, every day of the season. That’s what creates the confidence and the skill to attack full-court pressure and score points against it.
Lesson 3: Spread the floor.
The court is 94 feet by 50 feet. That’s 4,700 square feet. Make your opponent defend the entire area by aligning your players across the width and length of the floor.
Don’t congest the backcourt by bringing five attackers forward. Instead, spread them out. Here are two examples of useful attack formations.
Personally, I prefer the second. Its strength is the pressure it places on the defense across the floor, making it very dangerous for the defense to concentrate, or “bunch up,” its players on the ball near the end line.
Consider the position of #5, the “deep man.” Most often this is your center or big man, or the least mobile and poorest ball handler in the lineup. By positioning him near the basket, you accomplish two things. First, regardless of his skill level, he’s an immediate offensive threat—he must be guarded even if he’s the weakest player on the floor. Second, the alignment creates space, removing a defender from the backcourt and requiring the defense to guard most of the 94 foot-long court.
By resisting the temptation to place more than one primary receiver near the end line, you further isolate the midcourt attackers, which makes it easier to inbound the ball to them if the primary receiver can’t get free. With practice, it’s actually fairly easy to free the single primary receiver for the throw-in (even when double-teamed), and if denied, to free one or both of the midcourt attackers. They align about five feet from the half-court line but when necessary can move up if the defense grows overly aggressive.
Mark Seeberg was an assistant basketball coach at Loyola Academy in the powerful Chicago Catholic League for nearly twenty years. He was also a student trainer for the Notre Dame men’s basketball team during the Austin Carr era, 1967 – 71. Today, Seeberg runs a blog on college basketball, Better than a layup.